The Mainframe Pages: MIPS/ITR Charts
A word on MIPS: Although I am probably guiltier than most, it's better to work in terms of ITR as opposed to MIPS. The simplified reason is that when comparing processors with different architectures (e.g., RISC v. CISC), using MIPS is like comparing apples & oranges. See what IBM has to say on the subject: Why not use MIPS?.
|
IBM |
||
|
IBM |
||
|
IBM |
||
|
IBM |
||
|
IBM |
||
|
IBM |
||
|
IBM |
||
|
IBM |
Multiprise 2003, 3000 |
|
|
IBM |
||
|
IBM |
zSeries 800, 900 |
|
|
IBM |
zSeries 990 |
|
|
Amdahl |
470 |
|
|
Amdahl |
58xx |
|
|
Amdahl |
M series |
|
|
Amdahl |
Millennium 400, 500 |
|
|
Amdahl |
Millennium 700 |
|
|
Amdahl |
Millennium 800 |
|
|
Amdahl |
Millennium 200A |
|
|
Amdahl |
Millennium 200C |
|
|
Amdahl |
Millennium 200E |
|
|
Amdahl |
Omniflex |
|
|
Hitachi |
GX8000 |
|
|
Hitachi |
Pilot |
|
|
Hitachi |
Skyline |
|
|
Hitachi |
Pilot P9 |
|
|
Hitachi |
Trinium |
|
|
NAS |
all models |
|